Rocky Point Pool could be removed in future, raising concerns among Port Moody survey respondents

A lot of Port Moody residents want the city to keep the pool in Rocky Point Park.
An engagement summary of the Rocky Point Park and Old Orchard Park master plans was presented to council on July 9, and the biggest concern amongst respondents was the possible removal of Rocky Point Pool in the future.
Residents highlighted the pool’s importance for recreation, community wellbeing and swimming lessons for kids.
Local news that matters to you
No one covers the Tri-Cities like we do. But we need your help to keep our community journalism sustainable.
Coun. Callan Morrison echoed some of their concerns, stating council has done good work putting in a resident’s first policy to ensure local people have reserved spots for swimming lessons.
“If that pool was removed, our residents are concerned about where their kids will have swimming lessons within our community,” Morrison said.
The survey was asking questions about the city’s recommended design concept for each park, and while there are no plans to remove the pool in the 10-year master plan, staff said in the longer-term the space could be used in more beneficial ways.
Staff noted they received mixed feedback on the pool during previous surveys, the pool is nearing the end of its usable life and it could be moved to another location.
But out of the 380 survey responses, 37 percent said they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, with the possible removal of Rocky Point Pool being the dominant issue.
The city received 113 responses specifically raising concerns about the long-term plan that envisions other uses in the place of the pool.
One resident, speaking to council during early input, described the pool as “critical” for the city as its population increases and it focuses on building denser forms of housing.
He said Port Moody residents only have access to two local pools, and getting swimming lessons at Coquitlam’s pools is not feasible due to their early registration policy.
“If you’re two days late to the game, don’t bother to play,” he said. “We don’t have pools, and they won’t get lessons.”
Staff said they reviewed the public feedback, and emphasized the pool will remain in place for now, and any final decision will not be made until the Recreation Facilities Feasibility Study is complete and more community input is gathered.
“Over time as more studies are completed and engagement conducted, an alternative future vision – one that incorporates longer-term ideas and design concepts – may take shape for the pool and its current footprint in the park,” the staff report stated.
Another concern amongst dissatisfied respondents was the lack of parking, with some suggesting a lack of spaces for future demand.
Out of all feedback, residents also expressed concern about the upcoming introduction of paid parking, lack of accessible parking, and potential boat launch traffic.
There was general support for the youth zone and the skatepark, with respondents asking if the skatepark will eventually be covered.
The planned boardwalks for the parks also received support, although some concerns were voiced about safety, maintenance, and environmental impact
Respondents made suggestions regarding additional restaurants, food options, and picnic areas, separate bike and pedestrian pathways, and protecting the park’s existing trees.
